
Overview of Research & Initiatives
This lab was conceived between 2019 and 2022, founded in May 2023 and housed at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) since 2024 as The Cybercene Lab. In May 2025, it was renamed as the Multispecies Futures Lab to more accurately represent its primary goals and new projects, i.e. functioning as a gathering space for collaborative interdisciplinary explorations of pathways towards multispecies wellbeing and ecocultural habitability in a digitally-connected planet.
Our activities stem from a conviction that major ecological and socio-cultural crises of our times (such as climate change, identity-based conflicts, increased inequality, the Digital and A.I. revolution and the planet's sixth mass-extinction) are not separate phenomena but present important and understudied interconnections. We believe that these deeply entangled "naturalcultural" crises of our times must be urgently mitigated by better engagement and communication between scholars in the humanities and other disciplines, between academic and nonacademic experts, between human and "more-than-human" experts and between all these knowledge producers and the general public.
​
The lab is committed to developing new qualitative methods to enhance affective and epistemic impacts of multispecies abundance and damage: for example, naturalcultural discourse analysis and multispecies thick mapping, developed and now being deployed by the lab in its current projects.
​
We suggest that the underlying reasons behind corrosive Cybercene ecocultural practices are not technological per se, but affective, cultural, epistemic and psychic. If so, then it follows that effective solutions to the era's complex problems will be partial or ineffective unless they focus on these humanistic-and culture-centric processes.
​
CLICK here for a current list of specific projects being undertaken by the lab.
The Multispecies Futures Lab's potential initiatives mentioned below are our points of departure for the creation of a fertile, truly interdisciplinary ecosystem of thought and collaboration, that locates pathways to healing and habitability once again.
Cluster 1: Multispecies Studies
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Donna Haraway, in an alternative vision to the human-centric Anthropocene, suggests that the pathway towards healing and habitability lies within the realization of the "Chthulucene" - an era “made up of ongoing multispecies stories and practices of becoming-with” (Haraway, 2016). Marco Armiero calls for a renewed "sense of the commons": "because, as much as wasting relationships produce profit from exploitation and othering, communing relationships, instead, produce well-being through care and inclusion. (Armiero, 2021).
One of the primary goals of this lab is to create a gathering space for a broad coalition of thinkers and ecocultural practitioners to foster restorative pathways. These experts include Environmental Humanities intellectuals and practitioners that have often been under-recognized by mainstream thought--they often hark from marginalized groups--ironically, the very communities that have extensive experience in these matters. Diverse global ecocultural practices studied via this lab demonstrate that the way out of the othering practices of the Cybercene lie in the creation of relationship-based rather than resource-based connections. This approach is inspired by Indigenous studies scholars such as Dwayne Donald, who calls for a renewed sense of ethical relationality that is deeply embedded in many forms of Indigenous thought and practice. (Donald, 2009). In his forthcoming book, Nathan also suggests how and why multispecies communing, relationship- and kin-building can only happen in the Cybercene via a renewed importance of embodied connections.
Keeping in mind the possibilities of such multi-species, multi-kind sense of the commons to approach the world though an embodied, relationship-based rather than resource-based approach, the Multispecies Futures Lab is currently exploring the following questions:
​
Multispecies Solutions: How and why are effective solutions to cybercene ecocultural damage essentially multispecies solutions? Why are human, more-than-human and other-than-human entities all crucial to healing and habitability?
Restoring Value to Embodied Life: How are communities and individuals restoring care, value and attention to actual lives, bodies, landscapes and ecosystems?
Indigenous Peoples and Habitability: What are some of the ecocultural best practices that can be learned from the stories and experiences of indigenous and other such marginalized peoples and knowledges? How can these practices strengthen healthy communities located in urban, suburban, agricultural and wildnerness spaces?
​
Global Survivance of Marginalized Communities: The incredible diversity of bio- and ecopolitically marginalized communities can be mapped both historically and spatially. What can be learned via the survivance of these communities and cultures, despite continued impediments?
Inclusive Kinship in the Cybercene: How can an inclusive understanding of non-normative families and other forms of ethical kinship (affinity, being, belonging, creativity and solidarity) help foster further kinship in all communities?
Culture, Media and Wellbeing: How are literature, art and other practices of cultural expression questioning the corrosive and othering practices of virtual and screen realities? How are Cybercene mediatic tools used to combat Cybercene otherings?
​
Food, Culture and Sustainability: How can wasteful, unbalanced and extractive food ecosystems and practices can be transformed and made sustainable, healthy and culturally inclusive?
​
​
​
Cluster 2: Cybercene Studies
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
In 2022, while conceptualizing his forthcoming book and this lab, Vetri Nathan sought a new term that would function as an ecocultural gathering principal to describe our new digitally connected era and explore solutions to its most damaging consequences. He found it in the "Cybercene." The Cybercene Studies cluster examines the hidden, intimate yet powerful cause-and-effect relationships between mediatic "worlds"/representations and our actual, living. embodied world:
​
Screen Studies in the Cybercene: How and why are our relationships with cybercontent, as displayed on our all-ubiquitous screens, so powerful? What are the ecocultural consequences of these new and powerful relationships?
​
Multispecies Studies in the Cybercene: How have our entanglements with other species (plants, animals, microbes) changed in the digital era? How do people in the Cybercene experience and interface with actual natural habitats, spaces and landscapes?
​
Cybercene Media Consumption and Eco/cultural Damage: How does cybercene mediatic content influence the othering and wasting of lives, landscapes and ecoystems?
​
Cybercene Bio/Ecocultural Politics: How has digital media changed the way in which biopolitical and ecopolitical discourses are deployed, organized, managed?
​
Food Culture, Travel/Tourism Culture and the Cybercene: How has our understanding of cultural spaces, identities, places and food changed in the digital era? How do Cybercene media influence our consumption of cultural places and foods?​​​​​​​
​​
​




